AccountingBLOCK - Accounting Forums


AccountingBLOCK - Accounting Forums » General » Liabilities » Recognizing pre payment liability

Liabilities Topics and issues related to accounting for current, and long-term liabilites. This includes accounts payable.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2008, 06:38 PM   #1 (permalink)
Charly
 
Status: Getting feet wet
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 39
Charly will become famous soon enough
Default Recognizing pre payment liability

If a customer pays for an item that has not been shipped, I am confused as to how to account for that liability and which period should the liability appear in?

For eg. lets just say that an item was invoiced in august and now it is September and payment has not been received on the invoice yet. Should this transaction show as a liabilty on August's balance sheet, because that's when it was invoiced. Or should it not appear as a liability until payment is received?

Thanks...
Charly is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Old 11-18-2008, 06:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
tonalin
 
Status: n00b
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
tonalin will become famous soon enough
Default

You have no liability until you receive prepayment. The date you receive payment is the date you incur the liability. If there is no payment received then there is no liability... I hope that answered your question.
tonalin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 06:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Charly
 
Status: Getting feet wet
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 39
Charly will become famous soon enough
Default

yes that pretty much answer my question, thanks for the response...
Charly is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:48 AM   #4 (permalink)
Helse
 
Status: n00b
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13
Helse is on a distinguished road
Default

I disagree, with supporting argument for your position


My accounting professors and I disagreed on application of contract law. Payment under accrual method are deemed
obligations upon order completion (dependant upon legal enforcement). However, "obligation" is a term of law art. My
law professors chime an obligation is dependent upon consideration or terms. Accounting "Accrual" indicates the "obligation"
is dependent upon a legal obligation (identification of a defendant).

Circularly, if an order is unaccompanied by a contract (ex.: Supplies estimate requested; 30 day "money-back"; or, dependent upon recipient ) is the
order an "order", hence "bookable"? I say, "It depends". If I am paid after inspection, payment is dependent upon FUTURE acceptance. Accrual academics
predominantly opine, "Yes". If the rule of accrual prevails, if the fax machine delivers an order (UCC contract rules) the order is valid. Non UCC contract law
differs.

See: The Battle of Invoices; Contract Terms under the UCC.

Last edited by Helse; Yesterday at 03:52 AM.
Helse is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
liability, recognition



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Ad Management by RedTyger

web tracker



Nav Item BG