+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Foreign Intercompany translation

  1. #1
    n00b texx is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Foreign Intercompany translation

    If you have two foreign subsidaries (Non-US) that have intercompany balances between them and then both balances are translated into US Dollars, the balances (receviable and payable) in USD do not balance. Where does the difference go to when they are eliminated in consolidation by the US parent company, OCI or where? For example, 500,000 Euros translates into 5,347,400 SEK, but translating both to USD, 500,000 Euro translates into $707,700 USD and 5,347,400 SEK translates into $703,718 USD.

  2. #2
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Moderator Pat will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    38

    Default

    Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments are included in OCI.

    FAS52 http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?bl...lication%2Fpdf

    13. If an entity’s functional currency is a foreign currency,
    translation adjustments result from the process
    of translating that entity’s financial statements
    into the reporting currency. Translation adjustments
    shall not be included in determining net income but
    shall be reported in other comprehensive income.

  3. #3
    n00b wrei@comcast.net is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    12
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texx View Post
    If you have two foreign subsidaries (Non-US) that have intercompany balances between them and then both balances are translated into US Dollars, the balances (receviable and payable) in USD do not balance. Where does the difference go to when they are eliminated in consolidation by the US parent company, OCI or where? For example, 500,000 Euros translates into 5,347,400 SEK, but translating both to USD, 500,000 Euro translates into $707,700 USD and 5,347,400 SEK translates into $703,718 USD.
    I assume that the intercompany loans are $ dominated. i.e. the contractual obligation to pay back the is expressed in USD-$. Consequently, the subsidiaries that received the $ loans must keep them in their books as "foreign currency loans". At the end of each month, the foreign subsidiaries must realign their foreign currency denominated in other then their local currencies to reflect the corresponding orginal $ value expressed in local currency at the exchange rate that prevails at the end of each month. (This rate is communicated to the subsidiaries by the mother company to make sure that all subsidiaries relalign at the same rates) If this realignment at the end of the month results in a different local currency debt, the difference must be booked as foreign currency gain or (loss) in the local books. After that book entry, all the assets and liabilities of the intercompany balances balance again.
    Werner Reisacher

  4. #4
    n00b texx is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    4
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    No, the balances don't represent a loan, instead they represent sales from one foreign sub to another foreign sub, and both subs are owned by and consolidated into the US parent entity. For example, sales from a German sub are denominated in Euros, the functional currency of the Germany sub, and a Australian sub is the buyer and operaties in its functional currency, the Australian dollar. So the Austalian sub would convert from Euros to Australian dollar. When the US parent converts both subs to US dollars, there is a difference between the balances in US dollars, as I described in the original post.

  5. #5
    Pat
    Pat is offline
    Moderator Pat will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    152
    Rep Power
    38

    Default

    I'm sticking with OCI. Functional translation gains are normally included in income except for intercompany eliminations which are shown in OCI. Sales are translated using daily or monthly rates which differs from the rates used for fixed assets. Well that's my read of FAS52. What's your take?

  6. #6
    n00b Ingmar is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I used to do the books for a company with similar problems when I was still in Europe myself. This is what I always did.
    I worked for the CPA company that went through the customers administration every three months. I would look up the exchange rate at the end of every threemonth period (so basically the exchange rates per 03/31 + 06/30 + 09/30 + 12/31) and then translate every mutation in foreign currency to this rate. At the end of the three month period, when matching the accounts, I almost never had a problem.

    So basically you just determine a point in time, and an exchange rate. All differences from that exchange rate can be booked towards a special determined account in the Comprehensive Income section on the Profit- loss. These profits/losses can be considered exchange-rate results.

    Hope this helps

  7. #7
    Moderator Helse is on a distinguished road Helse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    610
    Rep Power
    51

    Default Physics of Accounting

    Argh,

    "Parent Company", per IRC subchapter F interpretation, is a term of art
    ("act of State"), not an accounting question.
    (ref.: IRS vs. UBS 07-2009 Case 1:09-cv-20423-ASG)

    Modern international entity strategies include Corporations, Partnerships,
    Limited Partnerships, LLCs, Trusts and foriegn entities that may or may not
    qualify under US law as "separate entities". Velcomen to International
    Accounting Standards affected by treaty.

    Black letter law: Treaty between contracting states supersedes IRS
    provisions*. Example, the famous Dutch subsidiary lease 'trick. If your
    examination includes income from a foriegn entity, domiciled within a
    recognized state, governing law found within treaty. Absent treaty, search IRC subchapter F
    Ref
    .: US Department of State Treaties Annual at California University
    Libraries, LexNex, West Law. (seriously, Try Rhoades & Langer, U.S. International
    Taxation and Tax Treaties
    )

    * pardon requesrted for reiterating the obvious.
    Last edited by Helse; 07-17-2009 at 06:27 AM.
    http://www.accountingblock.com/avatars/helse.gif?type=sigpic&dateline=1271928550

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Arcade Games | Video Game Trailers